@soaklord sadly most people now expect garbage customer service and care more about cost/convenience than good aftercare.
Plus there's rarely an option that provides truly good customer service. It's largely a myth.
Plus plus, more and more of these jobs are being automated and paying less. It's now a race to the bottom.
@soaklord I think you've proven my point. Apple and Samsung sell the same amount, Android sells more than Apple many months. People obviously aren't buying based on customer service. At least a majority aren't. Most phones anyway are serviced by the retail outlets e g. Service providers.
Look at top food chains. No customer service. Top airlines. No difference. Etc. Etc.
It's just not a thing anyone does very well, or well enough to drive customers in meaningful numbers.
@soaklord at least that's my opinion. I wish btw that it was true, that treating people well me them more likely to spend money with you, but... There's scant evidence it is.
@TimeSnow I think you'll find this article makes your point quite well. And yet, I still hold out hope for the Richard Bransons of the world disrupting businesses by actually taking care of customers.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/07/customer_satisfaction_is_our_highest_priority_ok_maybe_secondhighest_or_third/
@soaklord that article was great! ๐
I'm actually a relatively optimistic person, but not about businesses thinking spending more on it will increase their profits.
I'm glad you're trying to push it though!
@TimeSnow While cost/convenience do play a role in the overall consideration, I will say that good aftercare is still important in the minds of consumers. Android outsells Apple as a whole, however, the combined majority of smartphone handsets come from the two higher end manufacturers, Apple and Samsung. Apple's products come with years of aftercare in terms of software upgrades despite their refusal to race to the bottom and they are the most profitable of phone makers.